CMF / CRF Details

CMF ID: 6048

Increase retroreflectivity of STOP signs

Description: Implementation of STOP signs with higher retroreflectivity

Prior Condition:  Stop signs with low retroreflectivity

Category: Intersection traffic control

Study: Safety Evaluation of Increasing Retroreflectivity of STOP Signs, Persaud et al., 2007

 
Star Quality Rating:4 Stars  [View score details]
Rating Points Total:110
Crash Modification Factor (CMF)
Value:0.924
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:0.076
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF)
Value:7.6  (This value indicates a decrease in crashes)
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:7.6
Applicability
Crash Type:Angle
Crash Severity:All
Roadway Types:All
Street Type:
Minimum Number of Lanes:
Maximum Number of Lanes:
Number of Lanes Direction:
Number of Lanes Comment:
Crash Weather:Not specified
Road Division Type:
Minimum Speed Limit:
Maximum Speed Limit:
Speed Unit:
Speed Limit Comment:
Area Type:All
Traffic Volume:
Average Traffic Volume:
Time of Day:All
If countermeasure is intersection-based
Intersection Type:
Intersection Geometry:3-leg,4-leg
Traffic Control:Stop-controlled
Major Road Traffic Volume:Minimum of 344 to Maximum of 57,353 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Minor Road Traffic Volume:Minimum of 206 to Maximum of 9,178 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Average Major Road Volume :10,414 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Average Minor Road Volume :2,139 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Development Details
Date Range of Data Used:1994 to 2005
Municipality:
State:SC
Country:
Type of Methodology Used:Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes
Sample Size (crashes):725 crashes before, 247 crashes after
Sample Size (sites):108 sites before, 108 sites after
Sample Size (site-years):906 site-years before, 379 site-years after
Other Details
Included in Highway Safety Manual?No
Date Added to Clearinghouse:Dec 08, 2014
Comments:Crash type is right angle. The CMF is not significant at the 95% confidence level