Study Details

Study Title: Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation

Authors: Srinivasan et al.

Publication Date: SEP, 2009

Abstract: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) organized a pooled fund study of 26 States to evaluate low-cost safety strategies as part of its strategic highway safety effort. One of the strategies chosen to be evaluated for this study was improving curve delineation. Geometric, traffic, and crash data were obtained at 89 treated curves in Connecticut and 139 treated curves in Washington to determine the safety effectiveness of improved curve delineation. Treatments varied by site and included new chevrons, horizontal arrows, and advance warning signs as well as the improvement of existing signs using fluorescent yellow sheeting. All sites were on two-lane rural roads. To account for potential selection bias and regression-to-the-mean, an Empirical Bayes (EB) before-after analysis was conducted. The aggregate results revealed an 18-percent reduction in injury and fatal crashes, a 27.5-percent reduction in crashes during dark conditions, and a 25-percent reduction in lane departure crashes during dark conditions. The reductions were more prominent at locations with higher traffic volumes and sharper curves (curve radius less than 492 ft) and in locations with more hazardous roadsides (roadside hazard rating (RHR) of 5 or higher) compared to locations with less hazardous roadsides (RHR of 4 or lower). In addition, curves where more signs were either added or replaced (with a more retroreflective material) within the curve experienced larger reductions in crashes. An economic analysis revealed that improving curve delineation with signing improvements is a very cost-effective treatment with the benefit-cost ratio exceeding 8:1.

Study Citation: Srinivasan, R., Baek, J., Carter, D., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Eccles, K., Gross, F., Lefler, N., "Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation." Report No. FHWA-HRT-09-045, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., (2009)

Study Report: Download the Study Report Document


CMFs Associated With This Study

Category: Signs

Countermeasure: Install chevron signs on horizontal curves

CMF CRF(%) Quality Crash Type Crash Severity Roadway Type Area Type
0.96 4 4 Stars Non-intersection All All Rural
0.94 6 4 Stars Head on,Non-intersection,Run off road,Sideswipe All All Rural
0.84 16 4 Stars Non-intersection Fatal,Serious injury,Minor injury All Rural
0.75 25 4 Stars Nighttime,Non-intersection All All Rural
0.78 22 4 Stars Head on,Nighttime,Non-intersection,Run off road,Sideswipe All All Rural

Countermeasure: Install new fluorescent curve signs or upgrade existing curve signs to fluorescent sheeting

CMF CRF(%) Quality Crash Type Crash Severity Roadway Type Area Type
0.82 18 4 Stars Non-intersection All All Rural
0.82 18 4 Stars Head on,Non-intersection,Run off road,Sideswipe All All Rural
0.75 25 4 Stars Non-intersection Fatal,Serious injury,Minor injury All Rural
0.65 35 3 Stars Nighttime,Non-intersection All All Rural
0.66 34 4 Stars Head on,Nighttime,Non-intersection,Run off road,Sideswipe All All Rural

The information contained in the Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in the CMF Clearinghouse. The information contained in the CMF Clearinghouse does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation, nor is it a substitute for sound engineering judgment.