CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 11079
Install red-light cameras at intersections
Description:
Prior Condition: Intersections with No Red Light Cameras
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Analysis on Safety Impact of Red Light Cameras using the Empirical Bayesian Approach, Lee et al., 2016
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 125 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.84 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.04 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 16 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 4 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Angle,Left turn |
Crash Severity: | All |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Urban |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | No values chosen. |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | 2006 to 2011 |
Municipality: | Orange County, Orlando, Apopka |
State: | FL |
Country: | USA |
Type of Methodology Used: |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | Mar 16, 2022 |
Comments: | This CMF looks at crashes on All Approaches. |