CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 5485
Install red-light cameras
Description: RLR enforcement cameras
Prior Condition: Signalized intersection without red-light running cameras
Category: Advanced technology and ITS
Study: Still red light for red light cameras? An update, Hoye, 2013
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 95 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 1.06 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.15 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | -6 (This value indicates an increase in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 15.05 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | Other |
Crash Severity: | A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Not specified |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | |
Minimum Speed Limit: | |
Maximum Speed Limit: | |
Speed Unit: | |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
Intersection Geometry: | No values chosen. |
Traffic Control: | Signalized |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | |
Municipality: | |
State: | No state(s) chosen. |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Meta-regression |