CMF / CRF Details

CMF ID: 8184

Installation of fixed speed cameras

Description: Installation of fixed speed cameras on arterials limited access freeways

Prior Condition:  No speed camera present

Category: Speed management

Study: Safety effects of fixed speed cameras - An empirical Bayes evaluation, Hoye, 2015

 
Star Quality Rating:2 Stars  [View score details]
Rating Points Total:70
Crash Modification Factor (CMF)
Value:1.01
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:0.186
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF)
Value:-1  (This value indicates an increase in crashes)
Adjusted Standard Error:
Unadjusted Standard Error:18.6
Applicability
Crash Type:All
Crash Severity:K (fatal),A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury)
Roadway Types:Not specified
Street Type:
Minimum Number of Lanes:2
Maximum Number of Lanes:2
Number of Lanes Direction:
Number of Lanes Comment:
Crash Weather:Not specified
Road Division Type:
Minimum Speed Limit:50
Maximum Speed Limit:90
Speed Unit:km/h
Speed Limit Comment:
Area Type:Rural
Traffic Volume:
Average Traffic Volume:8740 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Time of Day:All
If countermeasure is intersection-based
Intersection Type:
Intersection Geometry:
Traffic Control:
Major Road Traffic Volume:
Minor Road Traffic Volume:
Average Major Road Volume :
Average Minor Road Volume :
Development Details
Date Range of Data Used:1997 to 2013
Municipality:
State:notusa
Country:Norway
Type of Methodology Used:Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes
Sample Size (crashes):98 crashes before, 69 crashes after
Sample Size (sites):174 sites before, 174 sites after
Sample Size (site-years):522 site-years before, 522 site-years after
Sample Size (miles):23.7 miles before, 23.7 miles after
Other Details
Included in Highway Safety Manual?No
Date Added to Clearinghouse:Nov 10, 2016
Comments:Short section: 100m upstream and 100m downstream of camera location